Jump to content

Talk:Drag Isn't Dangerous/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GnocchiFan (talk · contribs) 21:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "Background" section did not have the official name of the act, or when it went into place, so I've added that information now: [1] [2]. Could possibly mention how this anti-drag law is part of a longstanding anti-LGBT trope of drag queens being sexual predators of children IMO, but I'm aware this is not the main subject of the article (and the main article doesn't go into excessive detail on this) so ambivalent on this.
    "Timeline" in subsection could probably be integrated into article prose as opposed to bulleted list, with a little expansion, but not fussed either way.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Could do with more images if possible, but the promotional poster looks good for now.
  7. Overall: Overall good to go!
    Pass/Fail:

Comment: Thank you very much @GnocchiFan! My freaking first good article! 🤩 Thank you and I really freaking appreciated it! — JuanGLP (talk/contribs) 22:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, keep up the good work! 😃 GnocchiFan (talk) 08:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.